Blog
I’ve been thinking today about a quote from Stephen Altrogge:
Trying to stop the gospel is like pouring water on a grease fire. The gospel explodes in the face of opposition.
As I have been preaching through the book of Acts at our Sunday morning Gathered Worship, I have been thinking a lot about the pattern that followed Paul and the development of the Church. Paul would go into an area, go to the synagogue (the “religious” people), expound Jesus, find rejection, go to the Gentiles (the “irreligious” people), find general acceptance, then stir up opposition. It nearly always seems that as the opposition increases, Luke inserts one of his summary statements like Acts 19:20: “So the word of the Lord t continued to increase and prevail mightily.”
Why doesn’t the church in America find opposition like this anymore? In Acts 19:21-41, Paul finds himself in the midst of a riot because the spread of the Gospel meant that people were no longer buying idols and the idol-makers (no, not Simon Cowell), were losing money and became infuriated. Why don’t the modern-day “idol-makers” lose money with the spread of the Gospel? Why does pornography still flourish? Why is there still poverty and injustice? Why don’t we find opposition?
We live neutered lives and we preach a powerless message. Yes, the Gospel is about personal salvation, but it is also much more than that. It is about being with Jesus when we die, but it is also about living with and for Him now. It is the proclamation of Jesus as Lord and King, it is the news of a new Kingdom growing out of the thorns and thistles of this fallen world, disarming the rulers and authorities, creating a new people from all peoples unlike the old peoples. The Gospel should be dangerous. When it is, it fuels opposition. When it isn’t, we are simply viewed as another voting block or another consumer group.
Could it be that the Gospel in America rarely spurs opposition because we don’t preach the full Gospel? We love the individual, “that’s fine for you” elements, but we don’t like the part where it says that we are made different people with different affections and allegiances. After all, we don’t want people to think we’re weird and we certainly don’t want to offend people.
It is my heart that we at Church of the Cross would make a real difference in our city, that the “idol-makers” would be infuriated because we are changing the Northwest Phoenix Valley with, by and for the Gospel.
I want us to be a people with a deep-rooted Gospel that affects every area of life, not just ensuring that we’ll “go to heaven when we die,” but that calls, enables, empowers and indeed, demands that we live different lives here and now.
Wouldn’t you like to be part of a movement instead of just “going to church?”
What if, the next time you visited a local church gathering, they told you that they weren’t really interested in you attending church there? What if they told you that they weren’t really interested in you helping to keep their programs running or taking all of your time? Everyone wants to be part of something more, something bigger and yet so few of us have every experienced that in American Christianity.
What if, the next time you visited a local church gathering, they told you that they wanted you to be a part of a movement to change the world? Alan Hirsch, in his book The Forgotten Ways says that
each and every Christian has the seed-potential for world transformation.
What if we believed this? What if we lived like this? What if our churches not only expected this of us but sought to equip us to live this way?
This is the journey we have begun at Church of the Cross. Though, on paper, we offer much less than other churches (we “do” Sunday mornings and Community Groups), we are actually asking you to consider an entire reorientation of your life around the Mission of God (Missio Dei), to be part of a movement, to transform the culture of the NorthWest Phoenix Valley through the power of the Gospel.
On paper, Church of the Cross does two things: Sunday morning and Community Groups. This has been a conscious decision, but don’t let it fool you. Though we don’t have much on your schedule, we actually expect quite a bit from our members. In fact, we are striving to re-orient our entire lives around God’s mission. In John 20:21, Jesus said that just as the Father sent Him, Jesus is sending His people. God is a sending God and the Church is a sent people.
In Matthew 28:18-20, Jesus says that His people are to be about the business of making disciples and in Philippians 2, Paul makes the audacious claim that we are to consider others as more significant than ourselves because that is what Jesus has done for us. Jesus goes so far as to say that whoever follows Him must take up their own cross and follow Him (Matthew 16:24). Jesus says that he wants and demands and deserves our entire lives.
And yet, the way that we often approach church does not require our lives, it just takes up our time. Instead of equipping us, it leaves many of us drained. Instead of making disciples, it focuses much time and energy inward. I don’t by no means pretend that we have it all figured out or that we are somehow better than other churches, just that we’re trying another way. A harder way. It means that we seek out ways to serve rather than be served (Mark 10:45). It means that we don’t expect the church to do the work of ministry for us (Ephesians 4:11-16) but instead equip us to do the work of ministry.
Re-orienting your whole life around God’s mission is much more difficult than keeping some programs running. It means understanding yourself to be a missionary and all of life as the mission field. And this is best accomplished when we our time is freed up to connect with our family, friends and neighbors, serving them as ambassadors of the risen King. Though our calendar may not be all that full, it’s not because we don’t have lots to do, it’s because we want to be able to do it.
Here are two videos briefly introducing the idea of the Missional Church, something very much at the heart of what Church of the Cross are strives to be. There is often much confusion surrounding the word, but I wonder if we don’t often make it a bit more difficult and unclear than it really is.
Here is Ed Stetzer very briefly explaining missional:
What Does It Mean to Be Missional? from The Resurgence on Vimeo.
On January 12, a magnitude 7.0 earthquake hit Haiti, the worst earthquake to hit the poverty-enslaved country in hundreds of years. Estimates of those killed range from 50,000-200,000 but only time will tell. The devastation is so severe that, as of now, there’s really no way to know the exact details. Travel into the country is severely limited, which means that much-needed supplies are coming in slowly at best. People are still being rescued from the wreckage. Our friend Mark Driscoll has flown to Haiti to help spearhead relief work on the part of churches in the U.S. Driscoll’s first reaction: “Landed in hell.”
The churches in the United States are left wanting to help but without clear direction. Sending people may not be the best immediate solution and there are so many charities that it’s difficult to know who to trust.
We have decided to partner with Churches Helping Churches, an effort led by Mark Driscoll and James MacDonald. This organization will allow our resources to aid those who can most quickly put them to immediate use: the churches on the ground in Haiti. It frees us from wondering how our money will be spent and assures us that the name of Christ will go forth, even in the midst of great tragedy.
We ask that you prayerfully consider how God is leading you to help those suffering in Haiti. If you wish to partner with us in this effort, check can be made out to Church of the Cross and must be designated “Haiti” and we will direct the resources accordingly.
If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact us.
Wade Myers and Brent Thomas
- Visit the Churches Helping Churches website
We recently launched a Sunday School program. I’ve had several discussion with church planting friends about why we have pursued this. After all, Church of the Cross is still a fairly young church (we’re only a year-and-a-half or so old) so I wanted to share a few of the considerations that have gone in to this new venture. We have chosen to use the Story of God, which is a dialogue-based study of biblical theology, tracing the entire story of Redemption from beginning to end.
- God has blessed Church of the Cross with a lot of children: From the beginning, we have been a church with a lot of children. This is a privilege and a stewardship. We are very intentional about equipping the next generation.
- How do we best equip not only children but parents? Though God has blessed us with many children, ultimately, Sunday School and church are not substitutes for the role of the parent in the life of the child. We chose to use a curriculum that could involve everyone and that could be replicated in the home, giving parents a a natural bridge to begin family worship.
- What is the most missional approach? Our suburban culture is one that oftentimes expects something at church “for children.” Though we have steered clear of the “bigger, better, newer” entertainment-based ministry approach that colors so much children’s ministry, we do think it’s important to realize that, providing something for children may help us reach some families who otherwise might not consider Church of the Cross.
We are so excited about what God is doing in and through Church of the Cross and we woudl love for you to come be a part of it.
Our small groups will no longer be called Missional Communities. Instead, they will be called Community Groups. We originally used the term “Missional” to reinforce the idea of continually living on God’s mission of restoring all things to Himself through the Person and Work of Jesus Christ. We have spent a lot of time understanding that the Bible presents all of God’s people as missionaries. Your current context is a mission-field. Our Missional Communities were designed to ad us in living this way, but somewhere along the way, our groups lost the practice of mission as a core.
Wade and I have spent a lot of prayer and time trying to best encourage and equip the Church of the Cross family to first understand all of life this way and then actually live that way. In the pursuit of this, there are currently no more groups. Please know that we did not make this decision lightly. We have seen some truly Gospel-centered relationships develop and we know that many of you are sad to see your current groups dissolve. But that doesn’t mean your relationships dissolve. Instead, it provides opportunity for you to continue them in a number of ways.
Beginning the week of January 10, we will re-launch with three Community Groups. Please understand that very little changes. We will go from 2 groups to 3, each group will still meet weekly for a meal, to encourage and equip each other for mission. What will change is that each new group will be centered around a tangible mission. Many of us simply stand like deer in the headlights when we consider that Church of the Cross’ mission is to see the West Valley transformed by the Gospel. Where do we even begin?! However, when we live together on a specific mission, things are much more manageable.
Community Groups are the heart of Church of the Cross. This is where we seek to build Gospel-centered relationships, where we learn to bear one another’s burdens, where we are accountable, where we are equipped and where we live on mission together. Each group will focus around a specific and tangible mission with the end-goal of making disciples of Jesus.
In addition to the weekly gatherings for equipping, at least once/month, each group will have some activity that seeks to further this mission. Instead of looking for a group that meets your needs, we encourage you to prayerfully consider which group might best give you opportunities to serve. With that in mind, our new groups will be (leader and mission):
Robert and Oksana Gilliland will be targeting local college students. Robert will be enrolling in at least one class at Glendale Community College and if possible, we would love to see others follow his lead. However, you don’t need to be a student to be part of this group. Other ways to help are by opening your home for meals to local college students as others build those relationships. There are many other ways we are considering this opportunity. Please be a part of this exciting chance to see the Gospel flourish on our local college campuses.
Wade and Tanya Myers will be targeting their neighborhood. Again, you don’t need to live there to help. Wade and Tanya have done a great job building relationships with many of their neighbors and finding opportunities to tangibly show God’s love. Their group will help them further the Gospel through these relationships by helping them serve their neighborhood in a variety of ways.
Brent and Kristi Thomas will be ministering to the many families involved Adams Traditional Academy, where Miles and Owen attend school (as well as the Ruwald children). We will seek ways to help the school and build relationships with the families of faculty, staff and students.
There will sign-up sheets tomorrow at Gathered Worship. We encourage you to prayerfully consider which opportunity provides the best way for you to grow and serve. We are so excited about where God has led us so far and where He continues to lead. We are excited to see these groups live on mission and multiply. We are excited to see these groups become Jesus, hands and feet to a hurting world, transforming culture for His glory. Please contact Wade or me with any questions.
—
Brent Thomas
Church of the Cross
623.203.6509
www.churchofthecrossaz.com
Starting in January, 2010, we will be changing the name of our small group gatherings from Missional Communities to Community Groups prompting the question “what’s in a name?”
We originally used the name Missional Communities because the idea of living “missionally” is new for many people (read more on this here and here). While this has been useful to help many Christians re-think their lifestyle, it is not necessarily the easiest thing to explain, particularly to those people to whom we are trying to demonstrate and proclaim the Gospel.
Is it really missional to declare to everyone that they are your mission field? Maybe. But then again, maybe it actually serves to alienate the very people we are trying to reach, serve and love with the Gospel.
We believe that the people of Church of the Cross no longer need to have the word “missional” put in front of them at every turn because we are starting to live it.
For us, it has actually become more missional not to use the word.
As a new church, we have spent much time and put forth much prayer striving for the most biblical, most effective way to “do ministry.” Every church wants to see people grow closer to God and deeper in love for others. But churches often vary wildly on how they think these goals are best reached.
As we have searched the Scriptures and sought to learn from the many churches who have gone before us, we at Church of the Cross have become persuaded that the best approach is not necessarily the most popular. For many, the belief has been that the more we can get people involved in “church things,” the more spiritually mature they will become. But, to the shock of many, Willow Creek Community Church, one of the pioneers of the “program-driven ministry” model, recently conducted internal research that might lead us to believe otherwise. Skye Jethani discusses Willow Creek’s research and findings (please forgive me for quoting at-lenght):
“Earth shaking.” Ground breaking.” “Mind blowing.” That is how Bill Hybels, senior pastor of Willow Creek Community Church, described the data that had been laid in front of him. In 2004, the flagship of American megachurches undertook a study of their ministry to determine its effectiveness. Quantitatively, everyone considered Willow Creek a success. One of the largest churches in the country, it had effectively drawn thousands of “unchurched” suburbanites back to the institutional church. But was it really helping people grow spiritually? Was it accomplishing its stated mission of transforming people into fully devoted followers of Christ?Willow’s executive pastor, Greg Hawkins, summarizes the church’s program-driven approach this way: “We create a variety of programs and services for people to participate in … This is our strategy. We try to get folks who are far from God involved in these activities. We believe the more people are participating in these sets of activities with high levels of frequency it will produce disciples of Christ - people characterized by increasing love for God and other people. I know that might sound crazy, but that’s how we do it in churches. We measure levels of participation.”
Willow Creek’s qualitative study was launched to determine whether this assumption is accurate. Do people love God and love others more after regularly participating in the programs of the church? Do institutions produce disciples? Can programs ignite love? The conclusion reached after surveying 15,000 people at Willow Creek and twenty-five other churches was no. Hawkins says: “Increasing levels of participation in these sets of activities does NOT predict whether someone’s becoming more of a disciple of Christ. It does NOT predict whether they love God more or they love people more.”
This may have been the most illuminating conclusion of the study. It showed that most people didn’t need elaborate programs or pre-engineered activities to grow in their love for God and others. Following Christ did not require the institutions. “This was difficult to learn,” Hawkins says, “because we had viewed ourselves as helping people all along their spiritual journey.” But the data showed that the more spiritually mature people became, the more dissatisfied they were with the church. In fact, those recognized to be the most Christ-centered were the least enthusiastic about engaging church programs.
The research found that what impacted a person’s spiritual growth most were personal Bible reading, prayer and meditation, a meaningful relationship with a friend or mentor, and serving others.
Church of the Cross has set out to make Missional Communities the center of our ministry because we believe that it is the most effective and biblical way to make and grow disciples. Rather than offer a program for this and a class for that, we are trying to make community on mission the center of our approach. This means that, though our calendar may look a bit sparse compared to others, the expectation of you may in fact be higher. It means that we are trying to commit to ministering to each other and becoming equipped to understand and apply the Gospel to all of life.
We recognize that this approach may seem a bit unusual. But we’d like to invite you to join us in the process of learning to love God, love others and follow Jesus together. Let’s find out together if less on the church calendar can actually produce more fruit in our lives. Let’s find out together if fewer programs can actually result in more mature disciples.
There’s a fine line between being observant of the culture around you and pretending you have it all figured out. That line can be even more fine when you’re a new church trying to find your way. Part of how each church finds its way is by understanding who they are not and what they will not pursue.
At some point, many churches decided that people should come to us. Many churches not only decided that people should come to us but that the best way to attract people was the same way many companies attract consumers: newer, bigger and better! Churches invested in newer, more state of the art buildings, comfortable chairs, wow-your-face lighting and woo-your-ears sound systems, all with great programs, something for everyone in the family, fun for all ages!
One of the problems, of course, with this approach is that it is driven by competition, both externally and internally. You are always competing with the church just down the road with the bigger budget and you’re always trying to outdo yourself. The next thing you know, you’ve spend $11 million on a youth building or $130 million on a new sanctuary.
But there’s also a deeper problem here: we’ve come to view people as consumers, even when it comes to spiritual matters. We’ve come to believe that people should come to the church rather than us taking church to the people.
So instead of cultivating our lives around God’s mission of and Jesus’ example of entering into people’s lives, many churches have simply sought to attract people to our facilities and programs.
However, at Church of the Cross, we take a different approach. We try to remember that what we win people with, we win them to (people come to expect what first attracted them). Instead of newer, bigger and better with the hopes of bringing people to us, we would much rather find opportunities to love and serve our neighbors. If it is true that what we win people with we win them to, then we want to provide every opportunity possible for you to meet Jesus, because Jesus is the point of all that we do (John 14:6, Colossians 1:15-20, etc). We want you to feel love (1 Corinthians 13:13).
We are striving to form a community centered on and dependent on the Gospel (the Good news of who Jesus is, what He has done and is doing). We may never have the biggest building or the fanciest lasers, but if you’re OK with that, we’d love to invite you to pursue Jesus with us.
Every church wants you to know what to expect when you come. But perhaps it might be a bit more helpful sometimes if churches communicated what not to expect. After all, despite many of our attempts to “be different,” let’s be honest: many churches appear the same on the surface. How do we pull back the curtain a bit and get a real understanding for how each local church approaches being the church? To that end, we are beginning a series here at the Church of the Cross blog letting you know what not to expect from us. This isn’t meant to be off-putting (unless you’re looking for the things we don’t offer I guess), simply honest. We want you to know the church we believe God is calling us to be.
For example, don’t expect “top-down” ministry from Church of the Cross. In other words, “ministry” doesn’t come from only from the leaders in the form of programs. This conviction comes largely from Ephesians 4:11-16:
11And he gave the apostles, the prophets, the evangelists, the shepherds and teachers, 12to equip the saints for the work of ministry, for building up the body of Christ, 13until we all attain to the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God, to mature manhood, to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ, 14so that we may no longer be children, tossed to and fro by the waves and carried about by every wind of doctrine, by human cunning, by craftiness in deceitful schemes. 15Rather, speaking the truth in love, we are to grow up in every way into him who is the head, into Christ, 16from whom the whole body, joined and held together by every joint with which it is equipped, when each part is working properly, makes the body grow so that it builds itself up in love.
Notice particularly, in verses 11 and 12 that God have pastors “to equip the saints for the work of ministry.” Who does the work of ministry? The saints! This is a very different approach from what we have come to find in many churches. In many churches, the paid-staff is responsible for solving every problem and bearing every burden, but as Paul says in Galatians 6:1-2, we are to bear “one another’s” burdens.
What this means practically for Church of the Cross is that we stress living in community rather than a programmatic approach to discipleship. Gospel-growth happens in the context of relationship, not in a classroom. Our leaders are here to equip you to do the work of ministry, not to do ministry for you.
This means that we will look to meet needs through you rather than for you. We will urge you to try to live in Gospel-centered community with other believers, letting them know you, see your struggles and find opportunities to bear one another’s burdens, to speak the Gospel into one another’s lives. This means that, though we might have less on our official calendar than some other churches, the expectation may actually be higher. This means infinitely more than simply providing academic opportunities for you to learn more about the Bible. It means providing opportunities for God’s truth to lead to worship that fuels obedience.
None of this is simply in the pursuit of being different for the sake of difference. But if the biblical model is actually what Paul says in Ephesians 4, then maybe, just maybe we should stop expecting other people to do the work of ministry for us. Come join us at Church of the Cross in exploring just what this means for our church family.
One of the things we often talk about at Church of the Cross is trying to be “missional.” This is a new concept for some people, but really, at its core, it simply means that we try to live as missionaries in the context in which God has already placed us. God has already placed us in an immediate context surrounded by people who don’t yet believe in Jesus. Though there are many who are called to live this is out in foreign lands, we are trying to re-learn that the “mission-field” actually begins here.
The United States actually receives more Christian missionaries than we send. People in other parts of the world see what we so often miss: we need missionaries here.
Being “sent” is a fundamental part of being a follower of Jesus (John 20:21, Luke 24:44-48, Matthew 28:18-20, etc.). Just as God the Father sent Jesus the Son, so Jesus sends His people to the ends of the earth. If you are a follower of Jesus, you are already a full-time missionary.
Yet many of us protest at this concept, saying things like: “Yeah, but I don’t get paid by the church like Pastor Brent and I certainly don’t get paid by any missions organization …” Being a missionary is about much more than tracing where our paycheck comes from. Every follower of Jesus is already a full-time missionary, God simply chooses to route our income through different sources: for some, it’s the Phoenix Police Department, for others is selling cell phones, for others it might be waiting tables.
God is amazingly creative and persistent in His placement of missionaries! What if we began to change our thinking just a bit. What if, instead of thinking: “I can’t be a full-time missionary because I have to go to this office job five days a week,” we thought something like:
Jesus has come for Me, saving me to follow Him and call others to do the same. You won’t believe how He’s worked this thing out! See, I go to this office everyday and they have some things for me to do which I do the best I possibly can because that’s a way I can show people about God. And they let me use a computer, but I have a roof over my head while I’m there, sometimes they even provide coffee for me, can you believe it! But wait, here’s the best part, they pay me to rub shoulders all day long with people who don’t yet believe in Jesus! I get to talk to these people all day long and be part of their lives and I get paid for it!
It might seem a little silly at first, but I wonder what might change if more of us not only believed this but actually lived this?
As a new church, we get asked a lot to explain ourselves, to pick a label, as it were. We are convicted of Credobaptism (baptism of believers), but we’re not Southern Baptist (“Baptist” with a big “B” as I refer to it). We’re Reformed but not antogonistic. We’re loving but stress doctrine. We practice church discipline but know that we’re all sinners striving for holiness. We believe in cultural engagement rather than retreat. We believe that missions begins where our contact with unbelievers begins and then extends to the nations.
It may or may not surprise you that, when I began the process of planting Church of the Cross, I often felt a bit alone. We did not have a “sending” church in the traditional sense and I was not part of a denomination. But, as the lead planter of Church of the Cross, I also knew, without a shadow of a doubt, that I did not want to be a lone ranger, I had no aspirations of “going it alone.” I knew that I needed advice and accountability and I wanted Church of the Cross to be a part of something larger than itself.
Enter the Acts 29 Network. Acts 29 Network Director Scott Thomas introduces the network this way:
Acts 29 Network exists to start churches that plant churches. God is using our network to influence and shape the church planting culture through both solid theology and contextualizing the gospel. We will not waver on either of these commitments. We won’t water down our theology to reach more people and we won’t attack the culture in the name of Christianity. We are planting churches that are missionaries in their respective communities sent by Christ with the gospel (John 20:21). It is our desire to plant 1,000 new churches in the next 10 years. We desire to make your dream of planting a gospel-driven church come true. We count it an honor to partner with you and to serve you.
I get the “Why Acts 29” question quite a bit, so, I want to offer a few quick thoughts. Though there are certainly more reasons than these why we decided that Acts 29 was the best fit for us, these are some that I want to share with you:
- Jesus-centered missionality
I realize that “missional” is a bit of a junk-drawer word (surely you have a drawer somewhere in your house where everyone puts everything?!), but at it’s base, it communicates the idea of living like missionaries in our immediate context. Living on and in God’s mission. Missions involves cultural engagement and lays the groundwork for evangelism.
Acts 29 not only understands and encourages this but does so from a Christ-centered framework, putting Jesus at the center of everything. This is key and must not be overlooked. Indeed, as Mars Hill Church says: “It’s All About Jesus.” To claim to be “on mission” without Jesus is simply a fool’s errand at best, and suicide at worst. Acts 29 understands that, not only is Jesus the embodiment of God on Mission, He is our hope and strength as He sends us in His footsteps (Matthew 28:18-20).
- Vocal doctrinal commitment
It is a sometimes-tempting trap for many church planters to water down doctrine in the hopes of attracting more people. Acts 29 rejects such shallow options, understanding that, to open up your Bible at all and teach is to involve doctrine and we’d better strive to get it right. We only do disservice when we treat the things of God as though they’re merely self-help tools to get us our best lives. Acts 29 unapologeticaly encourages and empowers pastors to lead their people deep into the glories of Calvary.
- The centrality of the Church
While the doctrine (and practice) of the Church is under attack from nearly every direction (including many who profess faith in Christ), Acts 29 stands on the principle that the Church is at the center of God’s redeeming Work. It is for the Church that Christ laid down His life (Ephesians 5:25).
- The importance of family
It’s often been said: “As goes the home, so goes the church.” And yet, it’s quite common for many ministers to pour themselves out so much in ministry that they have nothing left for their families, which should be their primary ministry. Acts 29 not only understands this, they call their pastors/planters to first be family men before pastors. This is often sorely overlooked to the detriment of everyone involved. I am humbled to be part of a network that takes family so seriously.
- Calling Men to Be Men
I was never a jock and I cringe a bit when I see masculinity defined primarily in athletic/competitive terms. But, it doesn’t take long in most churches to realize that more women participate in church life than do men. Acts 29 is intentionally calling men to be men, to be sacrificial leaders, to be humbly bold, to lead their families and the church. This is much needed in our culture.
- Kingdom over Denomination
Acts 29 has members across the denominational landscape. I see this as a tremendous strength. Acts 29 strives to put the Kingdom over our differences (as important as they may be). It’s much more difficult to strive to work across those boundaries than it is to hide behind them. What’s even more difficult is to firmly hold certain doctrines in a closed hand while holding others in an open hand. I am honored to be part of a network that puts the unity of the Kingdom above the differences of denomination.
Most churches do a lot. A quick glance at the “events calendar” of many churches shows something on nearly every day of the week. Something for kids, something for teens, something for ‘tweens, something for the elderly, something for men, something for women, something for newly marrieds, something for yet-to-be-marrieds, something for the divorced, something, something, something. Not that something is bad, I just wonder if it’s the thing we’re really called to be doing.
Even as a new church, we get occasional calls from people needing help. We try to help as many of these people as we can. We try to be discerning about it, we have policies and procedures, but the bottom line is that we want to show Jesus’ love to as many people as possible in as many different ways as possible.
I recently spoke with a man who had a need. He thought that “church” was the obvious place to turn to in a time of need. But then he was either bluntly told “no” or “sorry, we only help our own church members.” As I sat listening, Now I know that my Greek isn’t nearly what it should be, but when Jesus commands us to love our neighbors (Mathew 22:39, etc.), I’m pretty sure that doesn’t translate as “sorry we only help our own church members.” That’s what clubs do, not the Body of Christ.
How is it that, when so many churches are doing so many things, people seem genuinely surprised when they encounter the love of Christ? What are we doing? Matthew 5:16 and 1 Peter 2:12 tell us to live in such a way that there’s no other explanation than for people to give glory to God. Jesus commands us to be “salt and light” (Matthew 5:13-14). I worry that many of us live lives condemned by James 2:14-16. We recognize that people around us need help, we might even say something about it, but we do nothing.
It is the prayer of Church of the Cross to be
to be a multiplying community of people transformed by Jesus, becoming His hands and feet to a hurting world, transforming culture for His glory.
As we “love God, love others and follow Jesus together.” May we never be a church that lets all of the things we do get in the way of the things we should do.
Our friends at Lifeway Research have found that, among their research, “82% of the unchurched are somewhat likely to attend church if invited … yet only 2% of church members invite.” In response, Sunday, September 13, 2009 has been declared “Back To Church Sunday.”
Back to Church Sunday is a national campaign specifically designed to increase church attendance by empowering church members with the tools they need to welcome neighbors, friends, and loved ones back to church.
Call it a gimmick. I’m not sure I would disagree. Though I applaud Lifeway’s efforts, the fact that we have to have a “back to church” day to remind/prod us to invite people to church simply means that we’re not doing it on our own. Though we might rightly discuss whether or not inviting someone to a Sunday morning service is the most appropriate means of connecting people to Gospel-community, it is, nonetheless an important piece of the puzzle.
I’d like to challenge our Church of the Cross family to make this more than a gimmick. Let’s make it a lifestyle to continually think of ways of including our unbelieving friends, family and neighbors. Let’s make our homes launching pads for the Gospel, let’s outstretch the arms of our Missional Communities, and let’s invite people to worship with us.
Let’s consider “Back to Church” Sunday a great starting point but let’s not stop there!
For more information about Back to Church Sunday, read here.
We’ve been making our way through Acts on Sunday mornings. What better book could there be for a church plant to consider together, right?
One of the recurring questions when dealing with the text is how to consider what is descriptive (merely telling us what happened) and what is prescriptive (you should do this too).
For example, at Pentecost, the believers, filled with the Holy Spirit, went out and spoke in foreign languages, proclaiming the mighty deeds of God (Acts 2:1-13). This seems to be descriptive rather than prescriptive, because, Pentecost was a one-time event and in 1 Corinthians 12:10, etc., Paul says that not everyone speaks in tongues. If not everyone speaks in tongues, then this is descriptive and not prescriptive.
However, at the end of both Acts 2 and Acts 4, we have a startling description of what this early community of believers looked like:
Acts 2:42-47:
And they devoted themselves to the apostles’ teaching and fellowship, to the breaking of bread and the prayers. 43 And awe came upon every soul, and many wonders and signs were being done through the apostles. 44 And all who believed were together and had all things in common. 45 And they were selling their possessions and belongings and distributing the proceeds to all, as any had need. 46 And day by day, attending the temple together and breaking bread in their homes, they received their food with glad and generous hearts, 47 praising God and having favor with all the people. And the Lord added to their number day by day those who were being saved.
Acts 4:32-37:
Now the full number of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one said that any of the things that belonged to him was his own, but they had everything in common. 33 And with great power the apostles were giving their testimony to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus, and great grace was upon them all. 34 There was not a needy person among them, for as many as were owners of lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold 35 and laid it at the apostles’ feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need. 36 Thus Joseph, who was also called by the apostles Barnabas (which means son of encouragement), a Levite, a native of Cyprus, 37 sold a field that belonged to him and brought the money and laid it at the apostles’ feet.
Now, I don’t know about you, but my first reaction when reading passages like that is that I want them to be descriptive and not prescriptive! Does God really expect us to live this way, considering others more significant than ourselves (Philippians 2:3), bearing each others’ burdens (Galatians 6:1-5), loving others because God first loved us (1John 4:7-21), laying down our lives for one another because that’s what Jesus did for us (1John 3:16-20)?
As uncomfortable as it might make us, I’m much more comfortable saying that these passages are prescriptive as well as descriptive. I’m not convinced that it means we have to go out and sell all of our stuff, but we should be willing to do just that and it shouldn’t seem out of the question.
Two questions arise here: 1) why did the early believers live this way and 2) why don’t we? The first answer seems obvious: they couldn’t live any other way. If Jesus is who He says He is, if He did the things Scripture records, lived perfect love and obedience, died our death, paid our penalty, died, was buried and then robbed death of its sting, appearing to His followers after death, then ascended and poured out the Holy Spirit, it makes perfect sense that these people would consider Him their greatest treasure, deny themselves and follow Jesus. What wouldn’t make sense is if they decided to just get together once a week, sing some songs, listen to a guy talk, eat some donuts and then live like nothing happened, like everything was “normal.”
The second question is much more piercing: why don’t we live this way? It is my prayer that we at Church of the Cross will break through the feeble walls of pride, selfishness and self-protection to do just that. It won’t be easy, it will be messy, but, how can we not love others when God has loved us so much?
Please join us as we explore together what Gospel Community looks like for our context.
The other day I didn’t feel very well and I missed our Missional Community. I’ll admit that I was a bit surprised at how disappointed I felt. But as I became more and more disappointed, I also became more and more pleased. let me explain: It is my humble prayer that Church of the Cross not simply be another place you go or another thing you do, but, in a very real, very tangible sense, family.
It’s often said that blood is thicker than water. How much more should this be true of those bound together by the blood of infinite worth? I wonder, do you think of your church as family? Do you miss the people, the experience, the fellowship when you miss or do “events” simply feel like an obligation to keep?
We have a unique opportunity as a young church to lay a foundation where church is not where we go but who we are, not an obligation but a joyful opportunity, but it cannot be forced. We must love because God first loved us (1 John 4:19), we must fulfill the law of Christ, bearing one anothers’ burden (Galatians 6:2). After all, it’s by our love for one another that the world will know that we belong to Christ (John 13:35).
This cannot be forced. It must flow from a convinced and conviction of the overwhelming value of Christ poured out for His people. So, as a pastor, if I want a community knit together as family, I must continually hold forth Christ. It’s often said around here that “It’s all about Jesus,” whatever it is we might be talking about. This is more than a cliché, it’s our desire; that we, like Paul, can say that we know nothing but Christ and Him crucified (1 Corinthians 2:2).
I have become convinced that there is a direct correlation between how close we feel to our church family and how high Christ is lifted up. When we make much of Him, we are drawn closer together, sealed with the blood that binds us closer than even physical family, overcoming every barrier.
I wonder, how did you feel the last time you missed church? Did you feel anything at all?
The more one looks around at the world we swim in, the more one realizes how radical biblical Christianity is from the rest of the world. The world exalts self. It seems that everywhere I turn I’m reminded of this. I was talking with someone the other day who recommended Ayn Rand’s philosophy of The Virtue of Selfishness as the best approach to life. Anyone who’s followed the Jon and Kate fiasco sees this virtue played out in the national media; two people choosing themselves.
But we don’t have to watch television to realize this. When left to ourselves look out for ourselves. This is so fundamental that it actually becomes the basis of the biblical command to love others: “love your neighbor as yourself” (Leviticus 19:18). Love of self is so basic that God has to go out of His way to say that we must think of others as much as we think of ourselves.
But this is not enough. It’s not enough to just love others, we must do this, but God says that we must “Do nothing from rivalry or conceit, but in humility count others more significant than yourselves” (Philippians 2:3). It’s not enough just to not think ourselves first. It’s not even really enough to love others in some sort of “I love everyone, aren’t we all happy,” type of generic, generalized way. God expects His people to consider others as more important than themselves, to elevate the needs of others above our own.
This is indeed radical, isn’t it? But, Paul says, we can and live like this because this is exactly what Jesus did for His people. Consider Philippians 2:4-11:
Let each of you look not only to his own interests, but also to the interests of others. Have this mind among yourselves, which is yours in Christ Jesus, who, though he was in the form of God, did not count equality with God a thing to be grasped, but made himself nothing, taking the form of a servant, being born in the likeness of men. And being found in human form, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross. Therefore God has highly exalted him and bestowed on him the name that is above every name, so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.
We love because God first loved us (1 John 4:19). John goes so far as saying that if we don’t love, we don’t know God, because God is love (1 John 4:8). Jesus tells His disciples how they will be known; not by their political affiliation, not by the movies they don’t see or the music they don’t listen to, not by the “family friendly” radio they listen to or the knick knack stores they frequent, Jesus says that the world will know we are His by our love for one another (John 13:35).
While the world wants to look out for self, there is something distinctively strange yet attractive about a community of people looking out for others. There is no other explanation than Jesus. But why is it that so few of our churches display this type of loving community? Though the reasons are probably many and varied, I wonder if one of the primary reasons is that we simply have not grasped the deep, deep love of Jesus. When we’re told that Jesus died so that we can have our best lives now, why would we see to consider others above ourselves? It is only when we grasp the depth of our sin and the height of Jesus’ love for His glory and His people that we will begin to be moved.
It is my prayer that we will be a people so gripped by the love of Jesus that we can’t help but pour it out on others. Think deeply on the Cross, where love and justice meet, think deeply of the nails that canceled our record of debt before the God who is and most clearly demonstrates love.
There's a common sentiment among many "missional" churches that often presents itself in the form of a question: "if our local church were to disappear overnight, would the surrounding community even notice, much less miss us?" The notion, of course, is that as we seek to love our neighbors, in some sense, we will also be seeking the betterment of our neighborhoods. It's not an overstatement to say that our local communities should be better places because we're there. In Jeremiah 29, God goes so far as to tell the Israelites to better the community of their exile.
While this is certainly a biblical idea, I was reminded the other day during a conversation with a friend, that, like many biblical concepts, this one requires a bit of balance. In John 15:18, Jesus tells His disciples that they should not be surprised when the world hates them because it hated Him. In Matthew 5:10, Jesus says: "Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness’ sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven." James makes the seemingly audacious admonition that we are to consider it joy when we encounter trials (James 1:2). It is the testimony of Scripture and the saints that the world will hate us because of our message and Savior.
So, should we really be trying to have our communities value us so much that they would miss us if we disappeared, and would they even really miss us if we did? The very question reminds us of just how prone to people-pleasing we really are. We are to love our neighbors, not so that they will love us in return (Luke 14:12) but because God has loved us (1 John 4:8). The missional question is really helping us focus on if we are living the Gospel; if we are helping widows and orphans (James 1:27), and helping the "least of these" (Matthew 25). Christians are to love their neighbors; not so that we can be valued but because God commands we do so. So, in a sense, it is the betterment we bring to a community that would be missed, not us per se.
In fact, when we are faithfully furthering the Gospel in demonstration and in proclamation, many will in fact hate us for the message we proclaim while at the same time holding us in high esteem. This is exactly what we find in the early church. Acts 5:13 says that no one dared join the Christians, though they held them in high esteem.
We must carefully understand that it is not enough for us to simply do good deeds without the Gospel. This is nothing more than rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic. We can tidy up a sinking ship all we want, but it's still sinking. On the other hand, far too many of us forget to demonstrate the power of the Gospel. We think that because the message is so important (and it is), that it is enough to simply point out to someone that they're going to hell, as if that's enough. Or we treat people like a project rather than a person. A whispered message while serving someone speaks louder than a megaphone ever will.
The missional question we began with is an attempt to get back at a full-orbed Gospel lifestyle, loving people because God first loved us, explaining why we love those around us, always pointing to Jesus. Would it be enough for us if they appreciated our deeds and despised us if they heard about Jesus and saw His love in action? The Gospel is Word and Deed.
We at Church of the Cross certainly don't get this balance right, but we invite you join us in finding that sweet spot of a fully-blossoming Gospel understanding and practice.
I’ll be the first to admit it: I often roll my eyes at object lessons. When speakers start to bring out the props to make their points, I sometimes get a bit cynical. That doesn’t mean object lessons aren’t effective, just that I often impose my own learning style on everyone else. There is often a fine line between gimick and effectiveness. But yesterday (05/17/09), our Church of the Cross family met for gathered worship at a local park.
If this was an object lesson, what was the point? As well intentioned as we often are, we still speak of “going to church. But the church is not the building. Instead, it is the people. Also, what better way to reinforce the desire to reach our community than to take our gathered worship to them?
As a brand new church, we have an unprecedented opportunity to examine everything that we do. What is essential, what is not, and most of all, why do we do what we do? It’s a great time to prayerfully consider what is biblical and what is simply tradition.
Will it be effective or simply perceived as a gimmick? Time will tell. Join us in finding out.
Most likely, you have a drawer somewhere in your house that catches everything without a designated place. In other words, a junk drawer. Interestingly enough, some words take on this quality as well. Nearly everyone throws a bit of uncategorized definition into the word, until it comes to resemble a junk drawer. Different people mean different things by the same word. If you’ve followed popular “Christian” culture over the years, the terms Evangelical and Emergent fell into this category.
The latest word to fall into this camp seems to be “missional.” In March, Christianity Today wrote an article asking ” What Makes a Church Missional?” More recently, my friend Jonathan Leeman wrote a piece for 9Marks Ministries asking “What in the World is the Missional Church?” It seems that “missional” has become a junk-drawer word.
The word has become mired in a good bit of both confusion and controversy which leaves us with some choices: we can abandon the word altogether, we can join the fray in fighting for a clear and broadly accepted definition or we can use the term being as clear as possible about what we mean by the word. We at Church of the Cross call our small groups “Missional Communities,” so we have obviously decided to use the word. We are not interested in trying to define the term for everyone, so we must be as clear as possible about what we mean with the word and why we have chosen to use the term.
We chose to use it quite simply because, when (we believe) properly defined, it gets right to the heart of what we want to be about. There are few, if any, other concise terms that can carry so much weight. But perhaps there is the necessity for a bit of clarification. I have seen many churches that are “mission-minded” that are not necessarily “missional.” Ed Stetzer, noted Southern Baptist missiologist helps us understand the difference in his book Planting Missional Churches (italics in the original):
“don’t confuse the terms mission-minded and missional. The first refers more to an attitude of caring about missions, particularly overseas. Missional means actually doing mission right where you are. Missional means adopting the posture of a missionary, learning and adapting to the culture around you while remaining biblically sound. Think of it this way: missional means being a missionary without ever leaving your zip code. You can see how a particular congregation or denomination can be mission-minded without being missional.
In other words, being missional means understanding and living like the mission-field begins at your doorstep. It means adopting missionary strategies (studying and interacting with the surrounding culture in biblically appropriate ways to penetrate it with and transform it from the inside out with the Gospel) and it means understanding that missions lays the foundation for effective evangelism. It means encouraging people to be conscious of every opportunity to live the Gospel out in their surrounding community. It means understanding that God has already called you to and placed you in a mission-field.
This does not discount foreign missions. Far from it. It means being convicted of the fact that it is hypocritical to think that we will go across the ocean to share the Gospel when we don’t go across the street. It means understanding that foreign-missions can be used as a band-aid for a lack of local involvement.
Until there is a better term for all of these concepts and practices, we will continue to use the term missional. We certainly don’t succeed at these things the way we’d like to but for now, we’ll strive to be missional.
It’s become quite trendy lately to speak of being “missional.” Though many different people mean many different things with this term, at its most fundamental level, it simply means living as a missionary where God has already called you to live. Missions doesn’t just begin somewhere “out there” but at our doorsteps. This means being intentional with everything we do. When foreign missionaries prepare, they do a lot of cultural work, asking questions like:
- What is their cultural background?
- How do they dress?
- What do they eat?
- How is family valued?
- How do they value family?
- What is their attitude towards money?
- How do they measure success?
- What value do they place on education?
- Do they commute? If so, how?
Of course, there are other questions to ask. What might some of them be? if you were to pursue foreign missions, what are some of the things you would want to know? How should one apply these methods to suburbia?
Tim Keller, pastor of Redeemer Presbyterian Church of New York City adds another component to these considerations. We have been created to worship. If we don’t worship God, that doesn’t mean we don’t worship. It simply means that we have another, functional god. In other words, we have an idol. Part of the role of the church plant, or any church for that matter, is to identify the idols of its culture and de-throne them.
What are some of the idols of suburbia and how can they be confronted with the Gospel? An obvious one seem to be status but what about family? Perhaps a bit more subtle, what about the ideas of security, community and a sense of belonging? In many ways, suburbia represents the fulfillment of “the American dream:” own a patch of land in a safe neighborhood with people they can relate to.
What are some other idols of suburban Phoenix and how can we de-throne them?
It doesn't take long for most of us to conjure up negative church memories of one sort or another. In fact, it seems that many of us have more bad church experiences than good ones. So much so that many just avoid the idea altogether. Others want to try calling it something different. In his book Simply Christian, N.T. Wright, Bishop of Durham, England offers some thoughts on this issue. Though it is a long quote, it is worth thinking about:
"I use the word "church" with a somewhat heavy heart. I know that for many of my readers that very word will carry the overtones of large, dark buildings, pompous religious pronouncements, false solemnity, and rank hypocrisy. But there is no easy alternative. I, too, feel the weight of that negative image. I battle with it professionally all the time.
But there is another side to it, a side which shows all the signs of the wind and fire, of the bird brooding over the waters and bringing new life. For many, "church" means just the opposite of that negative image. It's a place of welcome and laughter, of healing and hope, of friends and family and justice and new life. It's where the homeless drop in for a bowl of soup and the elderly stop by for a chat. It's where one group is working to help drug addicts and another is campaigning for global justice. It's where you'll find people learning to pray, coming to faith, struggling with temptation, finding new purpose, and getting in touch with a new power to carry that purpose out. It's where people bring their own small faith and discover, in getting together with others to worship the one true God, that the whole becomes greater than the sum of its parts. No church is like this all the time. But a remarkable number of churches are partly like that for quite a lot of the time.
Nor must we forget that it was the church in South Africa which prayed and suffered and struggled so that, when major changed happened and apartheid was overthrown and a new freedom came to that land, it came without the massive bloodshed we were all expecting. It was the church which stayed alive at the heart of the old Communist eastern Europe, and which at the end, with processions of candles and crosses, made it clear that enough was enough. It is the church which, despite all its follies and failings, is there when it counts in hospitals, schools, prisons, and many other places. I would rather rehabilitate the word "church" than beat about the bush with long-winded phrases like "the family of God's people" or "all those who believe in and follow Jesus" or "the company of those who, in the power of the Spirit, are bringing God's new creation to birth." But I mean all those things when I say "church."'
Though we don't and won't always succeed, it is our desire to rehabilitate your experience of "church."



